<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sun on zyxbac - running code</title>
    <link>https://www.zyxbac.me/tags/sun/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sun on zyxbac - running code</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 23:23:23 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.zyxbac.me/tags/sun/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>NVRAM U13: Sun SPARC Ultra on strike</title>
      <link>https://www.zyxbac.me/posts/grumpy-rant/nvram-u13/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2017 23:23:23 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.zyxbac.me/posts/grumpy-rant/nvram-u13/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;After several years of gathering dust in the cellar, I&amp;rsquo;ve finally dug out my Ultra SPARC again. Unfortunately, though, it wouldn&amp;rsquo;t boot straight away. The cause was (or still is) a flat buffer battery in the NVRAM U13. The fault was originally described in the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.squirrel.com/sun-nvram-hostid.faq.html&#34;&gt;Sun NVRAM FAQ&lt;/a&gt;. Just like the Sparc, the page is no longer available online, but can still be accessed via the &lt;a href=&#34;https://web.archive.org/web/20110902144447/http://www.squirrel.com/sun-nvram-hostid.faq.html&#34;&gt;Wayback Machine&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;rsquo;t yet managed to track down a new chip to replace it. It&amp;rsquo;s likely that this won&amp;rsquo;t be possible any longer. The chips are no longer in production, and even if there are any remaining stocks anywhere in the world, it&amp;rsquo;s safe to assume that the backup batteries in those have also already exceeded their lifespan. In the meantime, therefore, the information in the NVRAM must be corrected at every boot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
